Understanding of Personality

Description

Structure–Paper is well organized and organized into well–developed paragraphs. Each paragraph begins with a strong introductory sentence that provides an overview of the paragraph, and a concluding sentence that briefly summarizes the paragraph or helps to transition to the next. The thesis statement gives a clear overview of the paper–0–20 possible points14–20 points–Thesis statement is clear, well–written, and provides an overview of paper. Introductory and concluding sentences are consistently strong, and paragraphs are well–organized.13–19–Thesis statement needs further development, quality of introductory and concluding sentences is inconsistent.11–18 points–Thesis statement and/ or introductory sentences needfurther development. Introductory and concluding statements may not adequately introduce or conclude the paragraph. Paragraphs are not organized in a way that makes paper easy to read and understand.0–10 points–Thesis statement is absent or very unclear, and paragraph structure is absent or minimal.Quality of ideas–Ideas and arguments are well developed, well–supported, and detailed. Paper addresses all parts of the prompt. 0–45 points possible 36–45 points–Ideas are easy to understand, well supported with examples and/or sources detailed, clearly presented, and convincing. Information is accurate, and all parts of prompt are addressed26–35 points–Ideas are clear, but at times, lack sufficient detail, and may include some minor –inaccuracies. Ideas need more support. Parts of prompt may not be addressed. 17–25–Ideas are difficult to follow, lack detail, or include significant inaccurate information. Ideas are not well supported. Support for ideas and arguments is absent, minimal, or not well–supported.0–16–Ideas are very difficult to follow, not well supported (may rely too much on personal opinion without rationale), includes major inaccuracies, or does not adequately address the prompt.