Description
In this assignment, you will complete a draft of the next section of your analysis of a malpractice case.
To complete this assignment, review the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document.
I will Upload the Milestone I so that you may refer to Milestone I before you complete Milestone Two.
IHP 420 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a physician was found liable for medical malpractice. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Next, you will apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model to describe how the ethics issue could be resolved. You will also include a discussion about possible violations of the code of ethics in your given field. Lastly, you will augment or vary the facts of the case to create a hypothetical scenario that changes the outcome so that the physician is no longer liable for medical malpractice.
Prompt: In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. For this milestone, you will use the facts from the original case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, and apply a clinician–patient shared decision-making model.
III. Ethical Component: In this section, you will evaluate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision- making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidelines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents.
their patients, and the public.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, one-inch margins, and
at least three sources cited in the most recent APA format. All references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
|
Ethical Component: Ethical Issues |
Describes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, and supports with research and relevant examples |
Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, but description lacks details or does not support with research and relevant examples |
Does not describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and does not explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident |
18 |
|
Ethical Component: Ethical Theory |
Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, and supports with research and relevant examples from the case |
Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but description lacks detail, is illogical, or does not support with research or relevant examples |
Does not describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient |
18 |
|
Ethical Component: Shared Decision- Making Model |
Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient |
Selects a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but explanation lacks detail |
Does not select a physician– patient shared decision-making model and does not explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient |
18 |
|
Ethical Component: Ethical Guidelines |
Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents |
Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory |
Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent current and future incidents |
18 |
|
Ethical Component: Defend |
Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public |
Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogical |
Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public |
18 |
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Total 100%
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas |
10 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more