Description
Qualitative Theory Development Assignment Instructions
Overview
A conceptual framework links constructs and facilitates the development of theory. Develop a Conceptual Framework for the following:
Local government managers’ perceptions of transportation issues in their communities.
Provide a conceptual framework design in a figure and also describe it in text. Support your framework from the peer-reviewed literature (journal articles and texts) and theories of local manager’s attitudes and perceptions.
Instructions
Items to include are outlined as follows:
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Theory Development Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria | Levels of Achievement | ||||||
Content
(70%) |
Advanced
92-100% |
Proficient
84-91% |
Developing
1-83% |
Not Present | Total | ||
|
|
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Shows some understanding of qualitative research methods in public administration. |
1 to 16.5 points:
Shows a basic understanding of qualitative research methods in public administration. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Conceptual Framework | 32.25 to 35 points:
Detailed and relevant discussion of the Conceptual Framework for local government managers’ perceptions of local transportation issues.
|
29.5 to 32 points:
Good discussion of the Conceptual Framework for local government managers’ perceptions of local transportation issues. |
1 to 29.25 points:
Cursory discussion of the Conceptual Framework for local government managers’ perceptions of local transportation issues. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Theory Support of Framework
|
|
29.5 to 32 points:
Good review of theory supporting comprehensive framework. |
1 to 29.25 points:
Cursory review of theory supporting comprehensive framework. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Depiction & Analysis of Framework |
|
|
1 to 16.5 points:
Missing critical links in framework and analysis of concepts lacking comprehensiveness. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Structure (30%) | Advanced
92-100% |
Proficient
84-91% |
Developing
1-83% |
Not Present | Total | ||
Use of Sources from Course
|
|
12.75 to 13.75 points:
Use of 7-9 relevant sources from the module/week and previous modules/ weeks. |
1 to 12.5 points:
Use of 4-6 relevant sources from the module/week and previous modules/weeks. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Outside Sources
|
|
8.5 to 9 points:
Use of some outside scholarly sources. |
1 to 8.25 points:
Use of few outside scholarly sources. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Pages &
Spacing
|
|
4.25 to 4.5 points:
6-8 pages and double- spaced. |
1 to 4 points:
4-6 pages and double- spaced. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Grammar, Writing, &
APA |
|
12.75 to 13.75 points:
A few grammar, writing, and APA errors. |
1 to 12.5 points:
Several grammar, writing, and APA errors. |
0 points:
Not Present |
|||
Professor Comments: | Total: | /155 |
Readings to be incorporated into the assignment
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more