Discussion Forum III. Moral Dissonance and Resilience (Week 6)

Week 6. Discussion Forum: Draft in Progress  

In this Module wew will reivew your Comparative Anlaysis Part II  as a work in progress. Peers and faculty will preovide feedback as you continue to develop and refine sections of your comparative analysis paper.

Submit your Analysis and Application sections of the Part II Comparative Analysis paper:

• • Describe at least 2 similarities of the theory and the concept by identifying common characteristics followed by at least 2 opposing characteristics.
  • Apply your theory/concept pair to use with nursing education, nursing practice, nursing leadership, and nursing research.
  • The initial post should be made early in the week (no later than Wed). The initial post should include at least three scholarly references and should address the Ways of Knowing (see Discussion Grading Rubric) 
  • *Please note that you will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric criteria. The score you earn on your actual paper does not correspond to the grade you earn for the discussion.
  • Respond to at least 3 others and ask a question of your peer’s work to advance the dialogue. Use at least one scholarly source for each response post. 
  • Post across at least three different days during the week. 

Note: Within your initial post, if you have fully integrated core elements of the assignment, you will have addressed Ways of Knowing: iincluding supporting empirical references, nursing standards/ethical issues, and providing examples as they relate to nursing practice, education, and leadership.