IHP 430 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
In the final phase of this project, you will implement your performance improvement initiative. Additionally, you will discuss what success of the performance improvement plan will look like after implementation. If you chose a problem in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this final part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to formulate your paper.
V. Success of the Performance Improvement Plan
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
|
Success: Financial |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers reasoning pertaining to the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful |
Comprehensively describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful |
Describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful, but description is cursory |
Does not describe the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful |
20 |
|
Success: Information |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and hypothesis demonstrates nuanced insight into the relationship between information management systems and performance improvement initiatives |
Logically hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal |
Hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal but hypothesis is illogical |
Does not hypothesize how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal |
20 |
|
Success: Processes |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced insight into the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative |
Accurately describes the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative |
Describes what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative but description is inaccurate |
Does not describe what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative |
20 |
|
Success: Communication |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides keen insight into interdisciplinary communication patterns typically present in a healthcare organization |
Comprehensively analyzes interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative |
Analyzes communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative, but patterns are not interdepartmental or analysis is cursory |
Does not analyze interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative |
20 |
|
Scholarly Research |
Meets “Proficient” criteria byincluding three or more scholarly research articles that give in- depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue |
Includes two scholarly research articles that give in-depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue |
Includes some scholarly research but does not give in-depth support to identified interdepartmental issue |
Does not include scholarly research |
10 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas |
10 |
Earned Total 100%
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more