SPC 2608 Alaska Bible College Public Speaking Skills and Personal grooming Essay

Question Description

I have this class online ( public speaking )

we have usually one week we do Outline the other week we do the speech and the week after we do the reflection or review

Make simple

Here:

Directions: Write two paragraphs about what you learned about Public Speaking this semester.

  • Consider your journey throughout the course. Review your sample video speech from the beginning of the semester.
  • What personal goals did you set for yourself? How have you achieved those goals? What will you continue to work on after the course has ended?
  • Consider what you have learned about crafting an organized, researched speech for a specific audience.
  • Consider how you have applied what you have read in your course texts and supplemental materials in your informal and formal speeches. This is your opportunity to think back on the semester and examine how you have grown as a public speaker.

Rubric

#GEA2_Reflection_REVISED_19Nov2020

#GEA2_Reflection_REVISED_19Nov2020

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCLARITY/ORGANIZATIONThe reflection is organized into clearly and follows organizational tenants discussed in SPC2608

5.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENTThe reflection includes a discussion of sample video, goals, how goals have (or have not) been achieved, things the student will continue to work on beyond the end of the semester, and what the student has learned overall.

15.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnhanced Gen Ed Information and Data LiteracyStudents will know when there is a need for information, be able to identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share information for the problem at hand.

threshold: 1.0 pts

1.0 ptsSatisfactory: Student satisfactorily demonstrates information and data literacy attributes by using and sharing information to effectively and responsibly address the problem at hand.

0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory: Student does not satisfactorily demonstrate information and data literacy attributes.

—

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnhanced Gen Ed CommunicationStudents will produce well-organized, well-developed communications that reflect appropriate use of language to achieve a specific purpose and address specific audiences.

threshold: 2.0 pts

3.0 ptsProficient: Student demonstrates a thorough understanding of required context and is able to create a skillfully developed presentation that provides relevant, detailed, and compelling assertions supported by credible and relevant sources.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student demonstrates an adequate understanding of required context and is able to explore ideas that are fairly-well developed in a presentation that is mostly organized and includes basic use of relevant sources to support ideas.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student is able to develop simple ideas in portions of the assignment, provides a basic, somewhat organized presentation, and attempts to use sources to support ideas with some attention to context.

—

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnhanced Gen Ed Critical & Analytical ThinkingStudents will comprehensively explore issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating opinions or conclusions.

threshold: 2.0 pts

3.0 ptsProficient: Student identifies and states problems clearly and completely in understandable terms, carefully and comprehensively evaluates the relevance of assumptions and questions the viewpoints of experts when presenting a position, and formulates conclusions based on a thorough and logical thought process that reflects careful analysis of appropriate assumptions and evidence.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student identifies problems to be considered critically with some omissions or lack of clarity, gathers mostly appropriate information to develop coherent arguments, and questions some conventional assumptions and often considers opposing viewpoints when formulating conclusions.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student demonstrates some awareness of assumptions when identifying positions, states problems in simple terms without much clarification, generally accepts viewpoints of experts as fact without question, and routinely reaches conclusions not consistently tied to some of the available information.

—

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnhanced Gen Ed Problem SolvingStudents will design, evaluate, and implement a strategy to answer open-ended questions or achieve desired goals.

threshold: 2.0 pts

3.0 ptsProficient: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement and to identify multiple approaches to solve a problem that indicate insightful comprehension of the problem and carefully addresses multiple contextual factors and thoroughly reviews results relative to the problem with specific consideration of need for further work.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, proposes multiple solutions that suggest comprehension of the problem, some of which apply within a specific context, and reviews results relative to the problem with some consideration of need for further work.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student demonstrates a limited ability to identify a problem statement and approaches for solving the problem, provides vague and cursory solutions that do not directly address a problem, and reviews results superficially with no consideration of need for further work.

—

Total Points: 20.0

Previous

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more