Environmental Law Review of RCRA

Environmental Law Review of RCRA

Discussion Question 1: Review of RCRA

Based on your readings for the week, answer the following questions:

In your opinion, what was Congress’ intention when it created the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)?

In the context of the major criticisms of RCRA, explain whether you think Congress succeeded in its intent.

Examine the nature and scope of waste generators in the context of proper identification and management of hazardous wastes as established by RCRA.

Discussion Question 2: International Environmental Law

International law has a greater impact in the contemporary world than it did in the past. Distinguish the traditional definition of international law with the emerging aspect of trans-governmental approach to contemporary international law. Compare international environmental laws with U.S. environmental laws.

Based on the above information, answer the following:

Analyze which of these is more effective: traditional or contemporary international law. Provide reasons to support your answer.

In addition, identify the reasons why the U.S. has consistently refused to sign international environmental policy agreements such as the Kyoto Protocols and the United Nations agreement regarding the emission of greenhouse gases.

For information on The Kyoto Protocz

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.