SC 270 HUO Wk 4 Renewable Energy Environmental Literacy Plan Discussion

Question Description

Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Evaluation Title: Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

  • Use an energy calculator to determine how much energy your household consumes. Discuss how you could lessen the amount of energy that is consumed. What types of energy are used? Which of the sources are from renewable energy sources?
  • What is the impact of using nonrenewable energy?
  • Explore your community for evidence of renewable energy sources (wind power, solar power, geothermal, or nuclear). Take pictures of how it is implemented. What are these renewable energy sources doing for your community?
  • Discuss what sources are available and how they could be implemented.

Format this information using the template provided or create your own template. You may also modify the template layout as long as it meets all of the assignment requirements.

Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.

Submit:

  • Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV for your community (PDF or Word document)

Estimated time to complete: 5 hours

Assignment Files

Environmental Literacy Plan Template – Phase IV [Word Document]

Rubric

SC270 Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

SC270 Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC270-CO3

25.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

25.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

17.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

15.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

14.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

12.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

11.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

17.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

13.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

11.5 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

10.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

9.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

13.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

2.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

1.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Evaluation Title: Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

  • Use an energy calculator to determine how much energy your household consumes. Discuss how you could lessen the amount of energy that is consumed. What types of energy are used? Which of the sources are from renewable energy sources?
  • What is the impact of using nonrenewable energy?
  • Explore your community for evidence of renewable energy sources (wind power, solar power, geothermal, or nuclear). Take pictures of how it is implemented. What are these renewable energy sources doing for your community?
  • Discuss what sources are available and how they could be implemented.

Format this information using the template provided or create your own template. You may also modify the template layout as long as it meets all of the assignment requirements.

Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.

Submit:

  • Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV for your community (PDF or Word document)

Estimated time to complete: 5 hours

Assignment Files

Environmental Literacy Plan Template – Phase IV [Word Document]

Rubric

SC270 Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

SC270 Unit 4 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase IV

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC270-CO3

25.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

25.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

23.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

21.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

17.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

15.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

14.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

12.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

11.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

17.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

13.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

11.5 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

10.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

9.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

13.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

3.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

2.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

1.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more