Purpose: This Reading Response is intended to prompt students to think critically and thoughtfully about the assigned readings, therefore, in each essay you will articulate your intellectual impressions of the assigned chapters/articles: Schor, chapters 8 though 13; Prewitt, chapter 4; and Walsh, chapter 5.

Substantive Requirements: The questions you must address in your responses are few, however, they require direct answers as well as concise explication: 1) How do the assigned readings relate to the themes and issues of the topics covered? Explain. 2) What claims do the authors make? 3) Do the readings clarify or confound your understanding of the census/es and the consequences of classification regarding identity and community? Explain.

Mechanical Requirements: Each paper must be typed and a minimum of three full pages, maximum four pages. While no block quotations are permitted in the papers, you may use three short quotations and/or paraphrases—you are bound by the academic honesty policies of the class, departments, and the university to cite all quotations and paraphrases; in this class you will cite using CMS footnotes only (no other citation format is permitted; no bibliography/reference/works cited page or title page is required for these papers). Before writing the essay, review the “General Requirements” and the “Writing Assignment Grading Scales and Explanation” in the syllabus

Changing race (what we covered) its attached as well thanks!

i inclided the books as well.