Eyewitness testimonies and how reliable/accurate are they

The critical review is discussing how suggestibility plays a factor in testimonies. Discuss how (if) the confidence level of a eyewitness demonstrates how accurate their testimony is. For example: claims of if Confidence in lineups & mistake identification due to overconfident; ow does confidence affect the court trials; confidence & reliability in courtroom. The second main discussion point should be finding scholarly sources to critically review of reforming eyewitness testimonies due to the lack of accuracy of testimonies (if the study has found it this way), how testimonies contribute to wrongful convictions, and to reform, the system will need proper procedures for witnesses.

The critical review research paper needs to be the newest APA with 10 citations. The sources need to be scholarly journals and need to critically review each one. The paper must evaluate, integrate, and inform. For more in depth information on this, the information is listed below:

The first and foremost purpose of this paper is to provide an in-depth critical review of the topic you are examining. In preparing such a review, you are attempting to serve three functions:

1. INFORM: Your writing describes and clarifies the concepts, principles, theories, applications, and issues that are central and vital to your topic; by outlining your paper you can see what topics go into fulfilling this informing function. This is function probably will be the easiest to satisfy because you have had many assignments with this requirement. In pursing your topic, here are few tips on how to go about achieving this function:
find general references such as books, monographs, review articles and the like which provide an overview of and organizational framework to the topic;
search the literature for theoretical and research articles that deal with some of the more specific and interesting aspects of the topic; write a brief summary of these;
watch for repeated references to certain concepts, theories, finding, principles, authors and so forth — this gives evidence of how central or vital these matters are to the topic;
become familiar with the common terminology and methods (e.g., naming conventions, measurement instruments, testing techniques, etc.) encountered in your topic area (this helps with literature searches);
develop an outline of this material as you go along; fill in, drop out, and expand where appropriate.

2. INTEGRATE: Your writing reveals how you have drawn connections between and relationships among various concepts, ideas, research findings, etc. This integration may involve material that fits within the topical boundaries of your paper and/or is brought into consideration from areas outside of the topic. In serving this integration function, the point is to draw upon all that you have learned, within the field of psychology as well as in other disciplines relevant to your topic. Integration also can be achieved by showing how our knowledge or ideas may be applied to a problem or concern confronting professionals. In pursing your topic, here are some suggestions on how to go about achieving this function:
as you put together your outline for the paper pay attention to relationships or connections that exist among the various sections of your outline; keep an eye out for trends or consensus opinions that may emerge;
push yourself to ponder any connections you might be able to make with topics, problems or ideas you have studied in other courses or readings; now is a good time to put this knowledge to work;
watch for what other authors say about the implications for or speculations about matters related to your topic — these might trigger some of your own thoughts on how your topic relates to other issues;
look at your outline as a whole – is there anything that emerges or comes to mind as you ponder the big picture?

3. EVALUATE: Your writing provides an assessment of the value, utility, meaning, promise, and implications of the material which you’ve reviewed. To evaluate you must apply some set of criteria or standards for making a judgment about what you examined; hence, you need to be sensitive to the kinds of standards or criteria used by professionals in various arenas to evaluate the work of others. Developing a professional perspective implies that you are familiar with and can use such standards. In pursing your topic, consider these ideas on how to go about achieving this function:
examine and ponder the amount as well as quality of evidence that exists in support, or contradiction, of the ideas you’ve reviewed;
consider questions of how broadly one can generalize the ideas you have reviewed (to other situations or populations for example);
take note of controversies or debates you encounter in the literature; what are the points of conflict and how can you address these in your paper?
what alternative or non-mainstream thinking exists on the topic? Consider the current state of the art – is this the best we can do? Has something been overlooked or blown out of proportion?
what suggestions can you offer for further research and development in this area? Ask yourself, “Where do we go from here?” and evaluate, with a final integration and evaluation section at the very end of the paper.